| | Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic | |
|
| Add rule? | | yes. | | 76% | [ 10 ] | | no. | | 23% | [ 3 ] |
| | Total Votes : 13 | | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Admin Nugget

Posts: 1320
 | Subject: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:42 pm | |
| Arguments should be kept in PMs, if you want it public then go make a topic dedicated to them in the on-topic section.
Meaning if an argument breaks out, it get split and put in the spam pit, and asked to be moved to pms. if the argument reemerges again in another topic, 12 hour suspension to all parties that participate the second time around.
a heated civil discussion (wont be modded/moved) is hugely different from an argument.
vote for adding of rule to regulations. |
|
 | |
Khfan60

Posts: 2228 Age: 16 Location: Long Island
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm | |
| If this rule happens, Frost and GM will be perma-banned. |
|
 | |
Boxxy

Posts: 1878 Age: 16 Location: England
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:49 pm | |
| Yeah but thats GM and Frost, even if it breaks out we can still split it off else where to settle their.. differences? |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:50 pm | |
| I like the idea of having a sub forum dedicated to it. Keep it in one place so everyone doesnt have to read it. We could call it the fight club lol. |
|
 | |
TheGM

Posts: 3175 Location: THE MOUNTAIN TOP!
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm | |
| To call that a Argument is like calling a Shower a Typhoon, or The Matrix a Good Movie. Just wrong. |
|
 | |
Boxxy

Posts: 1878 Age: 16 Location: England
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:58 pm | |
| | TheGM wrote: | | To call that a Argument is like calling a Shower a Typhoon, or The Matrix a Good Movie. Just wrong. |
Exactly! You are playfully calling each other names. |
|
 | |
Frostbyrn

Posts: 22897 Age: 20 Location: Auckland,New Zealand
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 5:58 pm | |
| Hes Right we dont argue with each other at worst its good natured Jostling people take the wrong way
Anyway im going Cold turkey on arguieng with GM so
|
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 6:03 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
Chewy

Posts: 2641 Age: 23 Location: Ohio
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 6:38 pm | |
| Arguments are never really planned so I don't see this rule as being too effective if it's being put in place. _________________ You're the vulgarian, you fuck!  |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm | |
| | TheGM wrote: | | To call that a Argument is like calling a Shower a Typhoon, or The Matrix a Good Movie. Just wrong. |
you didn't like the matrix? that is kinda surprising but I could see why. |
|
 | |
TheGM

Posts: 3175 Location: THE MOUNTAIN TOP!
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 6:49 pm | |
| Fight scenes are ok. Then it becomes of a bunch of Self-Indulgent crap where the Directors think thet are smarter then everybody becuase they saw some French film from the 80' about the same thing. Then the next 2 get worse and worse. |
|
 | |
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic Wed 23 Feb 2011, 6:53 pm | |
| | TheGM wrote: | Fight scenes are ok. Then it becomes of a bunch of Self-Indulgent crap where the Directors think thet are smarter then everybody becuase they saw some French film from the 80' about the same thing. Then the next 2 get worse and worse. |
I have to agree with you there. The sequels were just awful. |
|
 | |
| | Rules Revision "Keeping Arguments in PMs" -Ontopic | |
|